Naïveté to Brilliance

Clojure No Comments »

Unlike Scala, even beginning learners of Clojure will experience the fun of functional programming almost immediately. 

Converting the Rails function “simple_format” from Ruby

def simple_format(text, html_options={}, options={})
        text = text ? text.to_str : ”
        text = text.dup if text.frozen?
        start_tag = tag(’p', html_options, true)
        text.gsub!(/\r\n?/, “\n”)                    # \r\n and \r -> \n
        text.gsub!(/\n\n+/, “</p>\n\n#{start_tag}”)  # 2+ newline  -> paragraph
        text.gsub!(/([^\n]\n)(?=[^\n])/, ‘\1<br />’) # 1 newline   -> br
        text.insert 0, start_tag
        text.concat(”</p>”)
        text = sanitize(text) unless options[:sanitize] == false
        text
      end

to Clojure (leaving out options)

(defn simple-format [text]
  (let [patterns 
      {#"\r\n?" "\n"  #"\n\n+" "</p>\n\n<p>" #"([^\n]\n)(?=[^\n])” (str #”$1″  “<br />”)}
      ]
    (str “<p>” (reduce #(clojure.string/replace %1  (key %2) (val %2)) text patterns) “</p>”)))

illustrates the fundamental naïveté of imperative programming with its silly reassignments, incidental state and mutability. It’s laughing at this and marvelling at the sheer brilliance of Clojure in equal measure that make Clojure so much fun.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in